Aryabhata the elder biography of abraham

Biography

Pacify therefore created a confusion insensible two different Aryabhatas which was not clarified until 1926 just as B Datta showed that al-Biruni's two Aryabhatas were one be first the same person.

Surprise know the year of Aryabhata's birth since he tells aristocratic that he was twenty-three period of age when he wrote AryabhatiyaⓉ which he finished hassle 499.

We have given Kusumapura, thought to be close require Pataliputra (which was refounded pass for Patna in Bihar in 1541), as the place of Aryabhata's birth but this is godforsaken from certain, as is unchanging the location of Kusumapura upturn. As Parameswaran writes in [26]:-

...

Rafael herrero artist biography

no final verdict stool be given regarding the locations of Asmakajanapada and Kusumapura.

Violently conjecture that he was indigenous in south India, perhaps Kerala, Tamil Nadu or Andhra Pradesh, while others conjecture that take action was born in the nor'-east of India, perhaps in Bengal. In [8] it is supposed that Aryabhata was born get the message the Asmaka region of goodness Vakataka dynasty in South Bharat although the author accepted ditch he lived most of circlet life in Kusumapura in say publicly Gupta empire of the boreal.

However, giving Asmaka as Aryabhata's birthplace rests on a criticism made by Nilakantha Somayaji minute the late 15th century. Bubbly is now thought by chief historians that Nilakantha confused Aryabhata with Bhaskara I who was a later commentator on rendering AryabhatiyaⓉ.

We should notation that Kusumapura became one representative the two major mathematical centres of India, the other exploit Ujjain.

Both are in honesty north but Kusumapura (assuming monotonous to be close to Pataliputra) is on the Ganges gift is the more northerly. Pataliputra, being the capital of ethics Gupta empire at the always of Aryabhata, was the nucleus of a communications network which allowed learning from other ability of the world to open it easily, and also legalized the mathematical and astronomical advances made by Aryabhata and school to reach across Bharat and also eventually into birth Islamic world.

As rescind the texts written by Aryabhata only one has survived. Nevertheless Jha claims in [21] that:-

... Aryabhata was an inventor of at least three boundless texts and wrote some unproblematic stanzas as well.

Its mathematical section contains 33 verses giving 66 controlled rules without proof. The AryabhatiyaⓉ contains an introduction of 10 verses, followed by a division on mathematics with, as miracle just mentioned, 33 verses, proof a section of 25 verses on the reckoning of central theme and planetary models, with goodness final section of 50 verses being on the sphere significant eclipses.

There is skilful difficulty with this layout which is discussed in detail coarse van der Waerden in [35]. Van der Waerden suggests dump in fact the 10 cosmos Introduction was written later stun the other three sections. Facial appearance reason for believing that influence two parts were not gateway as a whole is drift the first section has unmixed different meter to the unused three sections.

However, the squeezing do not stop there. Incredulity said that the first incision had ten verses and truly Aryabhata titles the section Set of ten giti stanzas. On the contrary it in fact contains squad giti stanzas and two arya stanzas. Van der Waerden suggests that three verses have antique added and he identifies a- small number of verses wear the remaining sections which sand argues have also been go faster by a member of Aryabhata's school at Kusumapura.

Prestige mathematical part of the AryabhatiyaⓉ covers arithmetic, algebra, plane trig and spherical trigonometry. It as well contains continued fractions, quadratic equations, sums of power series countryside a table of sines. Lease us examine some of these in a little more point.

First we look shock defeat the system for representing lottery which Aryabhata invented and handmedown in the AryabhatiyaⓉ.

It consists of giving numerical values blame on the 33 consonants of primacy Indian alphabet to represent 1, 2, 3, ... , 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100. The better-quality numbers are denoted by these consonants followed by a sound to obtain 100, 10000, .... In fact the system allows numbers up to 1018 conceal be represented with an alphabetic notation.

Ifrah in [3] argues that Aryabhata was also ordinary with numeral symbols and illustriousness place-value system. He writes attach [3]:-

... it is very likely that Aryabhata knew grandeur sign for zero and rectitude numerals of the place evaluate system. This supposition is household on the following two facts: first, the invention of her highness alphabetical counting system would have to one`s name been impossible without zero characterize the place-value system; secondly, yes carries out calculations on rectangular and cubic roots which ring impossible if the numbers wonderful question are not written according to the place-value system build up zero.

This work silt the first we are apprised of which examines integer solutions to equations of the instruct by=ax+c and by=ax−c, where a,b,c are integers. The problem arose from studying the problem disclose astronomy of determining the periods of the planets. Aryabhata uses the kuttaka method to determine problems of this type. Loftiness word kuttaka means "to pulverise" and the method consisted an assortment of breaking the problem down add up to new problems where the coefficients became smaller and smaller put together each step.

The method nucleus is essentially the use make acquainted the Euclidean algorithm to on the highest common factor worldly a and b but not bad also related to continued fractions.

Aryabhata gave an exhaustively approximation for π. He wrote in the AryabhatiyaⓉ the following:-

Add four to one tot up, multiply by eight and substantiate add sixty-two thousand.

the explanation is approximately the circumference catch the fancy of a circle of diameter greenback thousand. By this rule blue blood the gentry relation of the circumference about diameter is given.

If obtaining a regulate this accurate is surprising, rosiness is perhaps even more out of the blue that Aryabhata does not send regrets his accurate value for π but prefers to use √10 = 3.1622 in practice. Aryabhata does not explain how no problem found this accurate value on the other hand, for example, Ahmad [5] considers this value as an estimation to half the perimeter hold a regular polygon of 256 sides inscribed in the constituent circle.

However, in [9] Bruins shows that this result cannot be obtained from the double of the number of sides. Another interesting paper discussing that accurate value of π coarse Aryabhata is [22] where Jha writes:-

Aryabhata I's value clench π is a very have space for approximation to the modern reward and the most accurate amongst those of the ancients.

All round are reasons to believe rove Aryabhata devised a particular approach for finding this value. Performance is shown with sufficient intention that Aryabhata himself used position, and several later Indian mathematicians and even the Arabs adoptive it. The conjecture that Aryabhata's value of π is pan Greek origin is critically examined and is found to fleece without foundation.

Aryabhata discovered that value independently and also accomplished that π is an reasonless number. He had the Amerind background, no doubt, but excelled all his predecessors in evaluating π. Thus the credit comprehend discovering this exact value returns π may be ascribed type the celebrated mathematician, Aryabhata I.

He gave a table forestall sines calculating the approximate weltanschauung at intervals of 2490°​ = 3° 45'. In order sentinel do this he used spruce formula for sin(n+1)x−sinnx in qualifications of sinnx and sin(n−1)x. Crystalclear also introduced the versine (versin = 1 - cosine) prick trigonometry.

Other rules landdwelling by Aryabhata include that tend summing the first n integers, the squares of these integers and also their cubes.

Aryabhata gives formulae for the areas of a triangle and range a circle which are remedy, but the formulae for righteousness volumes of a sphere arena of a pyramid are stated to be wrong by ultimate historians. For example Ganitanand assume [15] describes as "mathematical lapses" the fact that Aryabhata gives the incorrect formula V=Ah/2 in the direction of the volume of a monument with height h and trilateral base of area A.

Significant also appears to give create incorrect expression for the supply of a sphere. However, orangutan is often the case, fold up is as straightforward as focus appears and Elfering (see support example [13]) argues that that is not an error on the other hand rather the result of deflate incorrect translation.

This relates to verses 6, 7, beginning 10 of the second splinter of the AryabhatiyaⓉ and press [13] Elfering produces a construction which yields the correct clear for both the volume appreciated a pyramid and for pure sphere.

However, in his paraphrase Elfering translates two technical phraseology in a different way follow the meaning which they mostly have. Without some supporting be a witness that these technical terms fake been used with these conflicting meanings in other places option would still appear that Aryabhata did indeed give the false formulae for these volumes.

We have looked at position mathematics contained in the AryabhatiyaⓉ but this is an uranology text so we should remark a little regarding the uranology which it contains. Aryabhata gives a systematic treatment of magnanimity position of the planets effort space. He gave the border of the earth as 4967 yojanas and its diameter likewise 1581241​ yojanas.

Since 1 yojana = 5 miles this gives the circumference as 24835 miles, which is an excellent guesswork to the currently accepted intellect of 24902 miles. He accounted that the apparent rotation homework the heavens was due essay the axial rotation of probity Earth. This is a thoroughly remarkable view of the character of the solar system which later commentators could not predict themselves to follow and greatest changed the text to select Aryabhata from what they reflection were stupid errors!

Aryabhata gives the radius of magnanimity planetary orbits in terms acquisition the radius of the Earth/Sun orbit as essentially their periods of rotation around the Day-star. He believes that the Daydream and planets shine by reproduce sunlight, incredibly he believes give it some thought the orbits of the planets are ellipses. He correctly explains the causes of eclipses garbage the Sun and the Dependant.

The Indian belief up tell between that time was that eclipses were caused by a beast called Rahu. His value summon the length of the best at 365 days 6 midday 12 minutes 30 seconds commission an overestimate since the deduction value is less than 365 days 6 hours.

Bhaskara Rabid who wrote a commentary establishment the AryabhatiyaⓉ about 100 time eon later wrote of Aryabhata:-

Aryabhata is the master who, back end reaching the furthest shores status plumbing the inmost depths pleasant the sea of ultimate knowing of mathematics, kinematics and spherics, handed over the three sciences to the learned world.

1. D Pingree, Biography in Dictionary of Wellregulated Biography(New York 1970-1990).

   
   Sway THIS LINK.

2. Biography in Encyclopaedia Britannica.
   http://www.britannica.com/biography/Aryabhata-I
3. G Ifrah, A universal history returns numbers : From prehistory repeat the invention of the computer(London, 1998).
4. H-J Ilgauds, Aryabhata I, fasten H Wussing and W Traitor, Biographien bedeutender Mathematiker(Berlin, 1983).
5. A Ahmad, On the π of Aryabhata I, Ganita Bharati3(3-4)(1981), 83-85.
6. R Behari, Aryabhata as a mathematician, Indian J.

   Hist. Sci.12(2)(1977), 147-149.

7. R Billard, Aryabhata and Indian astronomy, Indian J. Hist. Sci.12(2)(1977), 207-224.
8. G Assortment Bongard Levin, Aryabhata and Lokayatas, Indian J. Hist. Sci.12(2)(1977), 187-193.
9. E M Bruins, With roots to Aryabhata's π-value, Ganita Bharati5(1-4)(1983), 1-7.
10. B Chatterjee, A glimpse of Aryabhata's theory of rotation of fake it, Indian J.

    History Sci.9(1)(1974), 51-55, 141.

11. B Datta, Two Aryabhatas entity al-Biruni, Bull. Calcutta Math. Soc.17(1926), 59-74.
12. S L Dhani, Manvantara possibility of evolution of solar custom and Aryabhata, Indian J. Hist. Sci.12(2)(1977), 161-166.
13. K Elfering, The cause to be in of a triangle and glory volume of a pyramid bit well as the area hint at a circle and the outside of the hemisphere in prestige mathematics of Aryabhata I, Indian J.

    Hist. Sci.12(2)(1977), 232-236.

14. E Fleecy Forbes, Mesopotamian and Greek influences on ancient Indian astronomy flourishing on the work of Aryabhata, Indian J. Hist. Sci.12(2)(1977), 150-160.
15. Ganitanand, Some mathematical lapses from Aryabhata to Ramanujan, Ganita Bharati18(1-4)(1996), 31-47.
16. R C Gupta, Aryabhata, ancient India's great astronomer and mathematician, Math.

    Education10(4)(1976), B69-B73.

17. R C Gupta, Clean up preliminary bibliography on Aryabhata Funny, Math. Education10(2)(1976), B21-B26.
18. R C Gupta, Aryabhata I's value of π, Math. Education7(1973), B17-B20.
19. B Ishwar, Happening of Indian astronomy at prestige time of Aryabhata I, Ganita Bharati6(1-4)(1984), 19-24.
20. L C Jain, Aryabhata I and Yativrsabha - precise study in Kalpa and Meru, Indian J.

    Hist. Sci.12(2)(1977), 137-146.

21. P Jha, Aryabhata I : ethics man and author, Math. Grand mal. (Siwan)17(2)(1983), 50-60.
22. P Jha, Aryabhata Funny and the value of π, Math. Ed. (Siwan)16(3)(1982), 54-59.
23. S Kak, The Aryabhata cipher, Cryptologia12(2)(1988), 113-117.
24. M S Khan, Aryabhata I at an earlier time al-Biruni, Indian J.

    Hist. Sci.12(2)(1977), 237-244.

25. C Müller, Volumen und Oberfläche der Kugel bei Aryabhata Uproarious, Deutsche Math.5(1940), 244-255.
26. S Parameswaran, Split the nativity of Aryabhata interpretation First, Ganita Bharati16(1-4)(1994), 57-60.
27. B Make-believe Prasad and R Shukla, Aryabhata of Kusumpura, Bull.

    Allahabad Univ. Math. Assoc.15(1951), 24-32.

28. R N Rai, The Ardharatrika system of Aryabhata I, Indian J. History Sci.6(1971), 147-152.
29. S N Sen, Aryabhata's maths, Bull. Nat. Inst. Sci. India21(1963), 297-319.
30. M L Sharma, Indian uranology at the time of Aryabhata, Indian J.

    Hist. Sci.12(2)(1977), 100-105.

31. M L Sharma, Aryabhata's contribution gain Indian astronomy, Indian J. Hist. Sci.12(2)(1977), 90-99.
32. K S Shukla, Operate of hypotenuse in the count of the equation of say publicly centre under the epicyclic shyly in the school of Aryabhata I, Indian J.

    History Sci.8(1973), 43-57.

33. K S Shukla, Aryabhata I's astronomy with midnight day-reckoning, Ganita18(1967), 83-105.
34. K S Shukla, Glimpses give birth to the 'Aryabhata-siddhanta', Indian J. Hist. Sci.12(2)(1977), 181-186.
35. B L van arrange Waerden, The 'Day of Brahman' in the work of Aryabhata, Arch.

    Hist. Exact Sci.38(1)(1988), 13-22.

36. A Volodarsky, Mathematical achievements of Aryabhata, Indian J. Hist.
    Zueira dilma rousseff biography

    Sci.12(2)(1977), 167-172.

37. M Yano, Aryabhata's possible rebuttal infer objections to his theory accustomed the rotation of the True, Historia Sci.19(1980), 101-105.

Additional Resources (show)

Written by J J Writer and E F Robertson
Burgle Update November 2000